Offer employment services to people who show a knack for quality research abilities and a willingness to cite all works
There is an awful amount of disinformation on the internet, loaded with misleading statements and biased propaganda. In order to facilitate a broader objective based, individualized style of learning new information, I have an idea that is sound. By allowing contrasting information to what may already be accepted by the "curators" at Wiki, more unbiased, neutralized research should be permitted along with work being cited. A lot of Wikis descriptions of historical events and people are opinionated and published as fact. Unfortunately, many folks accept whatever Wiki publishes, whether 100% facts as gospel truth. Allowing submission of contrasting information from multiple contributors is already available. However, what if Wiki allowed multiple sides of the story to be submitted and able to be viewed in parallel interface observed in order to permit the user to make comparisons and contrasts objectively learning on their own instead of being subject to either accept what Wiki has published as truth or search elsewhere to make a well educated decision. It would generate more traffic for one, as well as keep the same users coming back to Wiki because of Wikis newfound reliable source for objective content. Since we live in society amongst our peers and legally we are held accountable by each other, a checks and balances system would ensure that the public users will be the trier of the facts basing their verdicts on burden of proof.
-
Mushak commented
Limestone and sandstone, at about 4 on the Mohs scale, are the only sedimentary stones commonly carved. Limestone comes in a popular oolitic variety, about twice as hard as alabaster, that is excellent for carving.
https://kitandkaboodle.com/accessories/sculptures-and-decore.html